Decision-Making in Japan: An Insider's Practical Guide for Western Businesses
By: Zakari Watto
Native Japanese Business Operator & Enterprise Decision-Maker
15 Years of Cross-Cultural Communication Expertise
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions
December 6, 2025
About the Author
Zakari Watto is a native Japanese business operator with 15 years of specialized experience in cross-cultural communication and enterprise decision-making processes. With direct exposure to how Japanese organizations evaluate foreign vendors, align stakeholders, and structure procurement decisions, Zakari brings an insider perspective that bridges the gap between Western sales methodologies and Japanese business realities.
Zakari, who established JapanInsider, collaborates directly with Western tech vendors, B2B SaaS firms, and enterprise consultants operating in Japanese markets. His approach combines deep cultural understanding with practical, measurable frameworks that compress sales cycles and build sustainable customer relationships.
Your direct guidance from a Japanese native on enterprise sales, nemawashi, ringi approvals, and stakeholder alignment. Discover how Japanese companies reach decisions and conclude agreements more quickly.
Executive Overview
This comprehensive guide provides a direct insider perspective on how Japanese enterprises evaluate vendors, make purchasing decisions, and manage risk. Written by Zakari Watto, a native Japanese business operator with direct experience evaluating foreign vendors inside Japanese corporations, this resource cuts through cultural stereotypes. It provides actionable frameworks for Western teams selling to Japan.
The core insight: Japanese business is not slow; it's systematic. Understanding nemawashi (pre-meeting consensus building), ringi (circulating document approvals), and how to read implicit signals transforms nine-month sales cycles into three-month outcomes. This guide provides a specific playbook.
The final step of the approval process: Applying the corporate seal to finalize a consensus-driven decision in a traditional Japanese boardroom.
Introduction: What You Need to Understand About How We Work
I sit inside Japanese corporations. I evaluate foreign vendors. I watch Western companies spend months on deals that could close in six weeks. I've seen brilliant technology fail because someone misread a polite deflection as interest. I watch deals die silently while Western teams think everything is fine.
This guide is me being direct with you about what matters when you sell to Japan, what we're thinking when we say certain things, and where most Western teams make their critical mistakes. It's not a theory. No observations. What I see from the inside, every day.
Japan's economy is $4.2 trillion. That's real money. But it moves differently than your market, and that difference isn't cultural decoration; it's how we manage risk, build trust, and avoid the chaos that comes from moving fast without alignment. If you understand this, you can compress your sales cycle from nine months to three. If you ignore it, you'll stall silently while wondering what went wrong (IMF World Economic Outlook, 2025).
I'm going to tell you what we need from you, how we think, and exactly what to do to move deals forward. Pay attention to the signals section. That's where most of you fail.
What You're Getting Wrong About Japanese Business
We're Not Slow. We're Risk-Averse.
Your first mistake is calling us "slow." We're not slow. We're careful. There's a difference. We distribute decision-making across multiple people specifically because we want to catch problems before they become expensive. When I evaluate a vendor, I'm not just asking, "Is this good?" I'm asking, "What could go wrong?" and "Who will blame me if this fails?"
That last question matters more than you think. In Western companies, if a system fails, it's often seen as bad luck or a learning experience. In Japanese companies, someone owns the failure. They suffered both financial losses and reputational damage that will haunt them for years to come. Our vendor evaluation process is comprehensive, engaging security, IT, finance, and operations teams. Our process of verifying consistency can lead to questions that appear superfluous.
This is not management. This is risk management. And that's why the pilots matter more to us than your demo ever will.
Your product is worthless without something to compare it to.
I'm not concerned with how innovative your tech is. I won't be the first unless someone I trust uses it. This is not unique to Japan, but we take it further than you probably expect and require a contactable reference from my sector or neighboring industries who can speak to the vendor's support quality during problem resolution, besides confirming the system's basic functionality.
Silicon Valley case studies hold no value for me, nor do testimonials from unfamiliar companies - I require evidence from within my network. If you don't have that, you're starting at a massive disadvantage, and you need to acknowledge that upfront. Hiding it only confirms my suspicion that you're hiding something.
Those who truly call the shots aren't present in the space you imagine
When meeting with suppliers, I'm both the decision-maker and the information gatherer who reports back. The actual decision happens elsewhere, in conversations you won't be in, among people I'm talking to before and after I see you. That process is nemawashi, and if you skip it, nothing happens in the formal meeting. The meeting isn't where decisions are made. This is where decisions are announced. That's why Western teams get confused. They present, give politeness, and then leave, thinking there, and then nothing happens. From my perspective, I was conducting information gathering so I could have intelligent conversations with my colleagues. From your perspective, you thought you were making a sale.
How We Actually Think About Your Proposal
When my team evaluates you, we're not primarily asking, "Is this the best technology?" We're asking: Can this company support us? Will they still be in business in three years? If something goes wrong, will they fix it or disappear? Can I trust this person to tell me the truth?
Your superior features and lower price are nice, but secondary. I can't afford to be the customer who chose a vendor that looked good on paper but abandoned us six months later. I can't afford to choose a vendor who promises support they can't deliver. The consequences aren't just financial—they're reputational.
This illustrates why reliability carries such weight with us - we opt for established providers with ten years in the business who price slightly above innovative newcomers with impressive features. The startup might be the better long-term choice; however, I must stake my credibility on the decision I reach, and I won't take that responsibility lightly.
Reading Between the Lines of Everything You Send Us
When you send documentation, we're not reading it just for information. We're reading it to understand your attention to detail. We're looking for consistency. If your Japanese translation has errors, I'm wondering whether you care about quality or whether you just machine-translated it to check a box. If your proposal says you'll support us 24/7, but you're based only in California, I'm wondering whether that's accurate or whether you're over-promising.
These details tell me whether I can trust what you say. And if I can't trust the small things, why would I trust you with something important?
We're Going To Check Everything
Anticipate that a team member will contact your references and search for unfavorable media coverage about your organization without prior notification. Verifying your financial stability is expected before a significant commitment. This isn't paranoia. They're exercising appropriate caution.
If you've told me something that doesn't align with what I find independently, that's a problem. It doesn't have to be a lie. It could just be imprecise language or a misunderstanding. But it creates doubt, and doubt slows everything down.
The Legitimate Method: Nemawashi, Ringi, and How to Practically Affect It
Nemawashi: This Is Where The Real Selling Happens
Nemawashi is not a formal meeting. It's a series of one-on-one conversations where I'm seeking to fully comprehend your proposal so I can accurately convey it to my colleagues and anticipate their potential questions. I'm also testing whether you're consistent—whether you tell me the same thing you tell the IT security person.
When I schedule a nemawashi conversation with you, I'm not doing you a favor. I'm doing my due diligence. I'm trying to surface concerns privately so that when we meet as a group, we're not wasting time rehashing objections.
Here's what you need to do: Prepare a one-page summary in Japanese. Not perfect Japanese—functional Japanese with business terminology. Include the problem, the solution, how it addresses risk, what a pilot looks like, and what success means. Carry this to all Nemawashi meetings. State exactly what you need. Don't use ambiguous timeframes.
Listen more than you talk. When I raise a concern, don't immediately jump to solving it. Ask me questions. Why is that a concern for your team? What would make you more comfortable? What's the worst-case scenario you're worried about?
This matters because I'm going to report back to my colleagues exactly what you said and how you responded to concerns. If you're defensive, they'll hear about it. Your thoughtfulness and skill in asking excellent questions will come back to them as well.
Ringi: The Approval Document That Actually Moves Through Our Organization
Ringi looks like bureaucracy to you. It's how we distribute responsibility for decisions. When a document circulates with approvals, everyone who signed it is accountable. That's why people take it seriously.
When you prepare Ringi-supporting materials, assume each person who reads them has limited time and specific concerns. The user team cares about usability and training. IT cares about security and integration. Finance cares about the total cost of ownership. Procurement cares about contract terms and vendor stability. Each of these people will read your materials, looking for problems in their area, and why a two-page document is better than a ten-page proposal. A two-page document to read. A ten-page document gets skimmed, and you don't get a fair evaluation. The executive summary is on page one, and the specific information is placed in supporting resources that concerned individuals can consult if they desire more extensive analysis.
Format matters more than you think. Use the format your customer's organization typically uses for Ringi. If you don't know it, ask. Providing materials in the wrong format signals a lack of understanding of our operations.
What We're Actually Listening For in Meetings
The first meeting is not your sales presentation
Before entering the room, my interest is already decided - this meeting is to evaluate whether we can work well together, if you understand our business approach, and if you'd be a good fit for my team.
I pay attention to three things: your preparation (did you research my company or did you give me a generic pitch), respect for our process (do you understand that I'm one voice in a larger decision), and your honesty (are you telling me what's really possible or what you think I want to hear?).
If you show up with a canned pitch, I'm already checking out. If you say you can deliver something that would require our organization to change significantly, and you treat that as no problem, I'm skeptical. You're more confident if you're honest about constraints and trade-offs.
Start the meeting by acknowledging the people in the room. Thank them for their time. Give them a brief context of why you're here. Inquire about their scheduling limitations. Honor those boundaries. If someone leaves early, don't stop them.
Then, present what matters most first. No features, your company history. What does this mean for their business? How does it solve a specific problem they face? Why does timing matter? Then provide details.
Invite questions throughout. When someone raises a concern, don't immediately have an answer. Acknowledge the concern. Take notes. Ask clarifying questions. Tell them you'll get back to them with a precise answer. This is better than guessing or over-promising.
End with crystal clarity about the next steps. Who needs to do what by when? What are you going to send them? If you follow up. Write this down and send it to them within 24 hours. If you don't follow up, I'm already doubtful about your reliability.
Reading the Room
When someone says "We will consider it" (Kento shimasu), they're not saying yes. They're saying, "I need to have conversations with people I haven't talked to yet." Your job is to find out who those people are and what they need to hear.
When someone says, "That may be difficult" (Muzukashii desu ne), they're probably saying no to the current ask. Don't push the same proposal harder. Ask what would make it possible. Is it the scope? Timeline? Cost? The support model? One of those is the real problem.
When someone says, "We need to discuss internally," they mean they're not ready to commit, and pushing for a decision right now will only create friction. Move the conversation to a specific follow-up date. It shows respect for their process.
When someone goes silent, that's not a good sign. Silence usually means concern, and you haven't created enough trust for them to voice it directly. Reach out and ask specific questions. "What would help you move forward?" "Our existing gaps?" And the difficulties your group is experiencing?
Pilots as Proof Points, Not Sales Trials
When I agree to a pilot, I'm agreeing to give you a controlled opportunity to prove you can deliver what you promised. I'm not committing to buying. I'm committed to testing.
The pilot needs to be short enough that we maintain focus and momentum, but long enough that we see real usage patterns. Typically, eight to twelve weeks. Longer pilots lose executive attention. Shorter pilots don't generate enough data to make an actual decision.
Define success metrics before the pilot starts. Specific, measurable metrics, and not "the system is stable, and the system has 99.5% uptime and zero security incidents." Not "users are satisfied and active user adoption reaches 70% and average session length is at least 45 minutes." These metrics need to be achievable with competent execution and clearly understood by both sides.
What happens if we hit the metrics? Be explicit. Does that mean we're doing a commercial rollout of exactly this scope? Should we expand to other departments? Are we growing our client numbers? Is there room for negotiating costs? Ambiguity regarding what follows a successful trial run is troubling and shows uncertainty about subsequent actions.
Support During the Pilot Is More Important Than Your Pitch
We're going to judge your reliability based on how you support us during the pilot. If we have issues and you respond quickly with actual solutions, I'm impressed. If we have issues and you blame us for not using the system correctly, I'm done.
When we hit problems, and we will, I want to see that you're genuinely invested in solving them. Not defensive. I'm not making excuses. Solving. If the problem takes longer than expected, keep me informed. Don't go silent. Silence makes me assume the worst.
The Negotiation Sequence That Works
Agree on Scope and Service Level Before You Talk Price
In your market, you probably lead with price. Don't do that here. Lead with scope. What are we trying to accomplish? How many users? Which systems? What's the timeline for full deployment?
Once we agree on the scope, we can talk about service levels. What's your availability guarantee? Your response time when something breaks? Which time zones are you covering? And what language support do we get? These questions matter because they determine cost.
Only after we agree on what we're delivering and what level of support comes with it do we discuss price. When we do, prices move quickly because the risk picture is clear.
Support and Warranty Clarity Matters More Than You Think
Please clarify the complete scope of inclusions and exclusions, warranty coverage versus paid support for issues, custom development pricing, and available training provisions.
Be honest about your limitations. If you can't support something, say so. I'd rather know upfront than discover six months after signing that you can't deliver what I thought I was buying.
Deal-Breaking Paperwork You Can't Afford to Neglect
Company Seals and Digital Signatures
Many of us now accept digital signatures. But check with procurement about which documents still require a company seal. Some contracts require it. Some amendments require it. The cost varies by company and document type. If you don't have this clarified and it becomes an issue during final signature, you've created unnecessary friction at the worst possible time.
Ask early. Get the answer in writing. Plan accordingly.
The Qualified Invoice System Is Not Optional
In October 2023, Japan implemented the Qualified Invoice System for Consumption Tax. This means invoices have to follow a specific format, and we have to have your tax registration number to claim input tax credits. If your invoices don't comply with this system, our accounting department can't process them. It's not a problem you can solve later; it has to be right from the start.
Get your tax registration number registered correctly. Provide invoices in a compliant format. Your finance team needs to understand this before its first invoice goes out.
Vendor Registration Can Take Time
Some organizations require vendors to be registered in their procurement system before orders can be issued. This is not something you can rush through at the last minute. It can take several weeks. If you're trying to close a deal quickly, ask about this early. If it's required, start the process immediately. Don't wait until after the contract is signed.
We will truly evaluate you once the sale has been completed.
The relationship didn't start at Signature. It Starts After Implementation.
You spent months getting me to sign a contract. Now you need to spend years making sure I don't regret that decision. Most Western vendors disappear after the signature. They move on to the next deal. That's when I decide whether I'm going to expand with you, renew with you, or find someone else.
Schedule a business review meeting within 60 days of launch. Not because the service is fragmented, but because you want to confirm everything is functioning as expected. Listen to feedback. Take notes. Commit to specific improvements. Follow through.
True loyalty develops during execution rather than during the selling phase. Your responsiveness, thoughtful approach, and genuine investment in our success will determine whether we renew. A purely business-focused attitude sends us looking elsewhere.
Timing Matters More Than You Think
Our fiscal year runs from April 1 to March 31
Most Japanese companies' budgets are for the April-March fiscal year. Budget approval happens in late February for that year. If you want to be included in a budget, your preliminary discussions need to happen months before that. If you're having initial conversations in February, you're too late for that budget cycle.
This means that if you want to close a deal in fiscal year 2025, you need to be talking to prospects by mid-year 2024. That's the reality of our budget cycle.
Golden Week, Obon, and The Year-End
Late April through early May is Golden Week. Mid-August is Obon. Late December through early January is the year-end holiday. Season During these periods, key decision-makers are traveling. You're not going to move deals forward. Don't try. Schedule around it.
If you're planning a 90-day sales motion, account for holidays. If one of those falls on your timeline, add two weeks. That's just how it works.
A Realistic 90-Day Timeline You Can Actually Execute
Week 1-2: Validate fit and prepare materials - You've identified the prospect. You've talked to local advisors and people who know the market, and created a two-page Japanese summary that explains the case. It's documented what success looks like. Timeline for completion: Your Japanese summary, initial business comprehension, and preliminary outreach approach.
Week 3-4: Map the organization - You've identified the key stakeholders. You understand who influences, who decides, and who blocks. You've found out how their ringi process works, what format they use, and who typically approves. Do you have a preliminary timeline for their decision process? Deliverables: Organizational map, approval workflow documentation, and identified primary contacts.
Week 5-6: Execute nemawashi - You've had one-on-one conversations with at least the key stakeholders. Learn what each person cares about. You've surfaced concerns, refined your proposal based on feedback, and got a preliminary agreement on the pilot scope.
Deliverables: Updated proposal, pilot outline, documented stakeholder concerns, and how you're addressing them.
Week 7-8: Run the first formal meeting - Meeting goes well. You've presented the results first. Show that you understand their business and have a preliminary agreement on next steps. Get the logical actions and follow-up dates.
Deliverables include: Conference notes, validated future steps, and question-response information for stakeholder feedback.
Week 9-10: Finalize pilot plan - You've locked down specific success metrics. You have broken down the roles of an operational organization, recognition, and what develops when missions are completed, and have organized timing and resource management. The deliverables consist of an approved pilot contract, a resource plan, performance milestone documentation, and a schedule.
Week 11-12: Support approvals and prepare for launch - You're supporting the ringi process. You'll be answering security questions and providing references if requested. You're preparing an implementation plan. Outputs: Finalized approval, executed contract, kickoff implementation materials, and timeline for the project.
This timeline is realistic if you have executive sponsorship, if you're not competing against entrenched vendors, and if the prospect is genuinely interested. Adjust based on your actual situation.
The Signals You're Misreading
"We will consider it (Kento shimasu) - This is not a maybe. It means, "I need to think about this and talk to other people." Your response: "Thank you for considering this. What would be most helpful in your evaluation? Who else should we connect with? What's the timeline for your next review?" Give them a specific reason to come back to you.
"That may be difficult" (Muzukashii desu ne). This is a polite no. Not, "I'll think about it." No. Your response: "I understand. What scope would work better for your situation?" Or "What if we approached it this way instead?" Give them an alternative path. If they still say it's difficult, accept that it's not the right fit right now.
"We need to discuss internally." This doesn't empower rejection. This means, "I need collective input before I can commit. Make it easy for them to move forward.
"We will get back to you after confirmation." I'm verifying viability with the teams I haven't reached out to yet.
Where to Get Help Without Damaging Your Reputation
If you're new to Japan and you don't have internal expertise, get help. But choose the right help. Don't choose consultants who treat culture as a quaint decoration. Choose partners who understand how Japanese organizations cooperate.
A good consultant can help you prepare materials that work in our market. They can help you avoid obvious mistakes and introduce you to the right people. You understand stakeholder concerns and can facilitate meetings. They can keep you from creating friction through cultural misconceptions.
What they shouldn't do is take over your relationships. You're the vendor. You need to build trust. The consultant is supporting that, not replacing it.
The investment makes sense if the opportunity is meaningful—five million dollars or more in annual revenue. For smaller opportunities, the consultant cost isn't justified. Do your homework, find someone who knows the market, and move forward carefully.
Measurement and Continuous Improvement
Track these metrics to understand how you're doing and where to improve:
Intro to first meeting conversion rate - Of the initial conversations you have, what percentage advance to formal meetings? Sixty percent is good. Below forty percent suggests your messaging or qualifications aren't resonating.
Days from first meeting to pilot start - How long does it take to move from an informal meeting to a pilot kickoff? Ten to twelve weeks is more typical than sixteen weeks, suggesting hidden concerns you haven't surfaced or insufficient nemawashi.
Pilot success rate - What percentage of pilots result in commercial expansion? A score of 80% or above shows excellent performance, while anything under 60% means either your pilot lacks genuine impact or expectations are too ambitious.
Time to commercial agreement from pilot completion - How long after a successful pilot do you have a signed agreement? Two to four weeks is normal. Longer suggests negotiation issues or continued risk concerns.
Renewal and expansion rate - After the first year, what percentage of customers renew? What percentage will expand their usage? Ninety percent renewal and thirty percent expansion growth are excellent. These numbers tell you whether you're delivering value.
Mistakes You're Definitely Making
You're treating "we'll consider it" as equivalent to "we're interested." You're not. You're being evaluated. Stay engaged, but don't assume momentum until you see specific progression toward the next milestone.
You're skipping nemawashi because it feels slow. It's not slow. It's efficient. Skipping it means you'll discover concerns in the formal meeting that should have been surfaced privately. That creates friction. Nemawashi prevents friction.
You send English documentation and expect it to circulate. It won't circulate effectively if multiple people with different English proficiency levels need to read it. Translate the essentials. Your customers will appreciate the respect and efficiency.
You're negotiating the price before resolving scope and support. That's backwards. The customer will try to reduce the price rather than accept a higher cost for better support. You'll both lose. Get support locked down first.
You're avoiding the uncomfortable administrative questions until the end. Then they kill the deal. Ask about seals, invoicing, and vendor registration early. Address these issues during active negotiations, not while attempting to close deals.
After finalizing the purchase, you move on to pursue other potential clients while customers determine if they'll renew, upgrade, or switch providers. Stay engaged. Cultivate partnerships. Develop devotion.
Conclusion: This Is Learnable
You don't need to be Japanese to succeed in the Japanese market. But you need to be willing to learn how we make decisions, and you need to treat that learning with respect rather than dismissal.
Everything in this guide is learnable. Nemawashi is a skill you can develop. Understanding ringi is straightforward. Learning to read signals takes practice, but it's absolutely doable. Preparing materials in Japanese requires an excellent translator, but it's not complicated. Following a timeline that matches our fiscal calendar is just planning.
What's not learnable is treating this lightly. You'll face difficulties if you arrive in Japan expecting to apply the exact strategies that succeeded in your domestic market. If you approach our culture as merely curious rather than fundamental, you'll overlook the cues, and when you believe you can outsmart our methods, you'll be unsuccessful.
But if you come with humility, with a genuine interest in understanding how we work, and with commitment to executing the fundamentals carefully, you'll find that Japanese customers are loyal, valuable, and genuinely interested in building long-term partnerships with vendors who take them seriously.
The marketplace is legitimate, all opportunities are real, and the system functions - what remains to be seen is if you'll commit to studying it.
Contact & Consulting Services
About Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions:
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions partners with Western technology vendors, B2B SaaS companies, and enterprise consultants to systematize their Japan market entry and acceleration.
Services include:
Stakeholder mapping and organizational analysis
Nemawashi facilitation and negotiation support
Materials development (Japanese translation, proposal design, ringi structure)
Sales process coaching and deal support
Pilot charter development and success metric definition
Post-sale relationship management training
Cultural communication coaching for sales and customer success teams
For organizations committed to succeeding in the Japanese market, our consulting engagements provide the expertise and guidance to compress sales cycles, avoid costly mistakes, and build sustainable revenue streams.
Contact Information:
Email: info@japaninsider.org Website: www.japaninsider.org LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/JapanInsider
References and Citations
Internal Resources:
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions. (2025). Japanese Business Etiquette Primer: The Insider View. Retrieved from https://www.japaninsider.org/the-insider-view/
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions. (2025). Respect, Hierarchy, and Rituals in Japanese Business: Cultural Guide for Western Operators. Retrieved from https://www.japaninsider.org/the-insider-view/
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions. (2025). Meishi Exchange and Organizational Hierarchy: Protocol and Execution Guide. Retrieved from https://www.japaninsider.org/the-insider-view/
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions. (2025). Japanese Enterprise Decision-Making: Stakeholder Mapping and Approval Routes. Retrieved from https://www.japaninsider.org/
Japan Enterprise Consulting Solutions. (2025). Nemawashi Strategy for International Vendors. Retrieved from https://www.japaninsider.org/
External Academic and Government Resources:
International Monetary Fund. (2025). World Economic Outlook Database: Japan GDP Analysis. IMF Publications. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO
Meyer, E. (2014). Navigating the Cultural Minefield. Harvard Business Review, 92(5), 119-123. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/05/navigating-the-cultural-minefield
Meyer, E. (2014). The Culture Map: Breaking Through Invisible Boundaries in Global Business. PublicAffairs.
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO). (2025). Investing in Japan: Market Entry and Regulatory Framework. JETRO English Portal. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO). (2025). Japanese Corporate Decision-Making and Procurement Standards. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/
Ministry of Finance, Japan. (2025). Japan's Fiscal Year Structure and Budget Cycle Guidelines. MOF English Portal. Retrieved from https://www.mof.go.jp/english/
National Tax Agency of Japan. (2023). Qualified Invoice System (Tekikakuhaito Seido): Implementation and Compliance Requirements. NTA Official Resources. Retrieved from https://www.nta.go.jp/english/taxes/consumption_tax/
National Tax Agency of Japan. (2023). Consumption Tax Framework and Vendor Registration Requirements. Retrieved from https://www.nta.go.jp/english/taxes/consumption_tax/
Tokyo Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2024). Foreign Vendor Integration Practices in Japanese Enterprises. TCCI Research Series. Retrieved from https://www.tokyo-cci.or.jp/en/
Matsushita, H. (2023). Nemawashi and Ringi: Decision-Making Systems in Modern Japanese Organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(3), 245-267.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (2001). Anxiety and Uncertainty Management in Cross-Cultural Business Communication. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 549-560.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business (3rd ed.). Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). (2024). Japanese Enterprise Risk Assessment Methodologies. JBIC Research Portal. Retrieved from https://www.jbic.go.jp/en/
Falkenberg, L., & Herremans, I. (1995). Ethical Behavior in Canadian and Japanese Business Decision-Making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 527-544.
Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development. (2024). Enterprise Procurement Standards and Vendor Evaluation Frameworks. JPC-SED Publications. Retrieved from https://www.jpc-sed.or.jp/english/
